View Full Version : whats a good 60ft time?

mike g
05-17-2001, 02:24 AM
well went to the track today for the first time, and i ran a best of 15.2 @ 91.2mph with a 60ft time of 2.4.

what is a good 60ft time is that about where it should be?

05-17-2001, 12:31 PM
2.4 sec. 60' time? Did you take about 7 Benedryl tablets a half-hour before the race?

15.2 @ 91.2 looks like a stock mustang with an inexperienced driver. Is it an AOD or manual? Just practice a little and you should get those 60' times to about 2.0-2.1 in no time.

Glen Meades, Jr.
1989 Ford Mustang Cobra Conversion
Born on June 2, 1989

05-17-2001, 12:38 PM
On street radials I would guess around 2.0 seconds. If you could cut that .4 at the light your ET could go down to mid 14's.

My old '86 GT (stock) with the AOD use to go 15.50's around 89MPH. My 60ft times were in the 2.40's. I was always breaking traction too. I drove badly!

With a stick, and even highway gears these 1987, and newer cars were going mid 14's around 95MPH back then.

mike g
05-18-2001, 02:16 AM
its a stick so its alittle harder to race then an automatic. i get killed at the launches because the track is wierd for some reason.

if i let my foot off the break to push the gas i start rolling backwards( this sounds like other tracks?) so what i have to do is keep my right foot on the brake and gas at the same time and that makes it alittle wierd but i guess the more i go the more i'll get used to it even though you'd think it would be level.

thx for the feedback guys

[This message has been edited by mike g (edited 05-18-2001).]

05-18-2001, 10:42 AM
The roll back thing at the staging lights use to happen at my local track too. The guys with the stick cars would have to apply the parking/emergency brake or they would sometimes roll out before the tree fired.

05-21-2001, 09:07 PM
What kind of tires do you have? You probably need to get some track tires. I have a message posted right now. I'm trying to find some good street/strip tires right now. I had bfgoodrich comp t/a's originally. I was pulling 1.774 60ft with a 13.35 @ 102mph out of an 87 GT with a 5-speed. However my car didn't roll backwards. I'd tach the car to about 6k (just before the rev limiter) and drop the clutch and off I'd go.

05-22-2001, 01:44 PM
How are you launching at 6k with BFg's?
Thats sounds more like 10.5 inch slicks. but, a 13.2 is an awsome et for 102 MPH.

Replying to a comment said a while ago, it doesn't matter what your reaction time is in regards to your E.T. My friends with turbo cars used to sit at the light until the right RPM, then launch. Their R/T was around 5 seconds, but their e.t's were 12.0's and 11.9's.

92 Mustang GT
Mods: World Products Windsor Sr. Heads, B303 cam, GT-40 intake, 70mm throttle body, 75mm mass air, MAC fenderwall induction, long tube headers, high flow cats, MAC catback, tremec 3550, 3.73 gears, auborn locker.Mac upper and lower rear control arms, lowering springs, 12 degrees timing. 250 HP, 294 Ft/lbs at rear wheels
Best time: 13.7 @ 103.1 MPH

mike g
05-23-2001, 12:11 AM
the only time reaction time counts is in eliminations. other then that the clock starts when you go.

you ever seen a cyclone they are a turbo charged truck we had one at the street races and he popped a wheelie totally stock i almost poopied in my pants.

05-23-2001, 12:54 AM
Mercury Cyclone
GMC Syclone

1983 Mustang GT (http://www.mustanggt.org/photo/83tuttle.htm) 306/T-5(project in progress)
1994 Ranger Splash (http://www.geocities.com/mt83rd/index.html?986572015220) 4.0L/A4LD(daily driver)

mike g
05-23-2001, 02:03 AM
syclone =)

5.0 killer
06-06-2001, 01:37 PM
How about a 1.40 60footer, ran that in my 11second turbo car

Rather die in a vw then drive a ford

06-06-2001, 05:33 PM
Well this site finally got one, I was wondering how long it would take before some ford or 5.0 hater would come here and flagrantly wave thier banner of ignorance. An 11 second VW? Maybe if you drop in a ford engine. Are there no VW boards out there? Shoo fly, don't bother us, go back to the terd from whence you came.

5.0 killer
06-06-2001, 06:19 PM
Hey man, dont hate, theres a **** load of 11second street vw's. Ive got a 5.0 also, but its just not as cool. Ever been spanked at the track by a VW? haha, the look on their faces.

mike g
06-06-2001, 06:40 PM
a bug? at sears point i've seen a bug and a carmengia(sp?) go ll.40s it was awesome cause thats is the best sleeper of them all.

5.0 killer
06-06-2001, 07:19 PM
haha, Mike, its Karmman Ghia. out here on the west coast theres alot of Bad Vws. We get plenty of respect at the track, and on saturday nights.

06-06-2001, 07:20 PM
Seems to me the "cool" cars are always the ones that everybody always brags about racing against and/or trying to beat. And then somebody chooses 5.0 killer for a name? Point proven.

We ALL know any STOCK VW, regardless of model, is slower that a STOCK 5.0L Mustang. That is unless the kiddies want to compare a loaded(AOD-E, leather, Mach 460, etc.) '95 GT convertible that does low 16s.

Can anybody say 13s from a bone stock '93 SVT Mustang Cobra?

1983 Mustang GT (http://www.mustanggt.org/photo/83tuttle.htm) 306/T-5(project in progress)
1994 Ranger Splash (http://www.geocities.com/mt83rd/index.html?986572015220) 4.0L/A4LD(daily driver)

[This message has been edited by Mick (edited 06-06-2001).]

5.0 killer
06-07-2001, 06:06 PM
I dont think a stock VW could even run 16s. But they can get 30mpg easy. What do you expect from Hitler's "peoples car"?